Report: Triple H vs. Undertaker In Talks for WrestleMania

[I Am Me]

Holy crap someone else posted something longer than a sentence, sweet!

[NDX]

Holy crap someone else posted something longer than a sentence, sweet!

I count 4 sentences in my post.

Taker's definitely lost a few steps over the years. But that's understandable seeing how he's beaten himself up over the years. Most people move they way he does now normally. He only moves that way because of decades of abuse.

[I Am Me]

I count 4 sentences in my post.

I'm sorry NDX, I should have counted how many sentences you posted before making my post

[Kid Kash]

I had 3 or 4 in my post as well. I want an apology or some KFC.

[NDX]

What the hell is with all the KFC? Where the hell are the standards on this board?!

[Creed]

Well... Page 3 has fairly degenerated this thread's post qualities.

[Turley]

That, to me, makes about as much sense as some of the people on this site who continuously bury the Observer and then, when it suits their own individual arguments, use the Observer as a reference. Hcurrent examples.

this thread has seriously nothing to do with that. How sad does that make you? I think it is time to get over things because your inability to let things slide and your need to consistently whinge about the things that constitute the chip on your shoulder has now ruined a great thread where two people were having a red hot debate.....

I really dont think we will ever know what his peers really think about him, until the Undertaker retires and doesnt carry so much political nouse within the WWE changerooms. I can realistically see people biting their tongues as to what they really think, through fear of being made accountable.

[Creed]

I actually agree with Truth, he made alot of sense with his comparison there, Turley.

And I will say this one last thing. If people in the industry can say so many bad things publicly about Triple H and even Vince McMahon, they certainly wouldn't have a problem bashing The Undertaker, if there was anything to bash. So far, nothing.

[Turley]

I dont get Truths point..... where was the observer mentioned in this thread prior to him coming in.

you only really get the opinions about guys like HBK and HHH from guys that are no longer with WWE. People dont really like to say things about their seniors so to speak.

There is a fair bit of talk about the Undertaker working stiff when he thinks guys need a lesson, and about him being the main man back stage. With what we know about the WWEs backstage climate, it isnt too much of an inference to assume that up and comers are wary about what they say about The Undertaker.

[Creed]

I'm just bumping this thread because I forgot how good some of the debates on this forum were, and I'm VERY proud of the one myself and I Am Me had here. Undisputed competitors, as one of the founders of that forum I advise you to take notes!

P.S. Is I Am Me still around?

[Veritas]

P.S. Is I Am Me still around?

No, just about all the quality posters are gone these days. Granted I don't log on much these days but I can't remember the last time I spent more than 5 minutes reading a quality debate on OWW. For the most part I just skim the topics unless I come upon something from Tambourine or a select few others.

[Turley]

And here's me thinking its improved since certain people left

[Darth Shizzel]

Cat fight rawr

[Veritas]

And here's me thinking its improved since certain people left

Eh, that's your opinion. Mine is the quality of posting has taken a significant hit since the exodus of most of the older members. It's all opinion, no need to get snippy.