Fair or Foul: WWE's "Make Me A Sandwich, Woman!" Philosophy Towards the Divas

[Shockage]

The female heels are portrayed as whores, the good chicks are portrayed as useless (like Kelly Kelly), or in Mickie James' case - fat. Vickie Guerrero is portrayed as ugly. Gail Kim was being paid to do nothing. But what if they're making a lot of money? They're able to live comfortably, pay the bills, help out their families and not get too physical. Is it worth it? Or are WWE Divas the smart ones as they're able to do so little in the ring and rake in a hefty pay cheque while their counter parts in the indys give it their all like starving artists?


What say you?

[Goldie79]

Finanically it would seem so.

Some of these divas have been degraded and asked to commit humiliating acts (Trish Startus barking like a dog on all fours to in a lustful attempt to please the aging billionaire Vince McMahon) ...but they won't care. If they get paid well to be sex kittens I bet they couldn't care less what they are asked to do.
If some of the more prominent divas are bringing in say $250,000 a year.... thats probably 5 or 6 times more than what your average Joe is making.

Because the WWE employs much more male wrestler & onscreen characters... the women (in terms of love stories) tend to get around don't they?
In a short time AJ has moved from Punk, to Bryan and now to Cena.
I even remember Vinces very own daughter, Stephanie McMahon being tainted as a sl*t after moving from Test, to Triple H ... and then being all over Kurt Angle.
Just think about what Lita had to put him with (though some of that was justified!)